By Alexander Graham
In countries throughout the world,
there is talk of merging fiscal policies and monetary elements. It hasn’t hit
the US yet but many economists feel that it could soon move our way. Many
economists in foreign countries such as England and France are afraid of what
could happen and are trying to prevent it. But honestly is it such a bad thing.
Many people argue that if the merger goes through it will put political power
in the hands of banks, and regulation of the money systems will fall also upon
the politicians. This doesn’t make much sense as the political power is already
very tight in the political party as is but how could a merger end up trading
that power anyway, it just doesn’t make any sense, also that politicians would
handle money regulations is ridiculous. In as far as a central bank is
genuinely independent; politicians do not influence Monetary Policy Committee
type committees. Thus there is equally little reason to suppose they would
influence the sort of Monetary Policy Committee type committee advocated by
Positive Money.
The Governor of the Bank in
England, Mervyn King said in his speech that to combine fiscal policy and
monetary systems will end up being close if not the same thing as himself
standing in the streets handing out 50 pound notes, in the end if it doesn’t
accomplish the goal, would prove to be impossible to reverse. That speaking
this must mean that the merger would also be impossible to reverse but how
difficult would it have been really to reverse such a merger. Cutting off the
opportunities of such companies should reverse any effects that it has upon the
system. But what seems to be most
confusing is that it will be assumed that because two areas of the government
are becoming one it will force the two workers of each department to work as
one, but people tend to not do more work than they have to and so assuming that
they will do work for the other department is a little odd to begin with. I
personally feel that citizens feel the need to freak out about something so
even if there is nothing, they can and will find something to “freak” out
about. So since the “freak” out mode is
small for the time being, many people have found that this possible action that
is happening in ENGLAND may be perfect for the job.
Anyway, this is a tiny blip on our
radar. It is not something that should affect us at all and most politicians
and economists believe that we should ignore it. It isn’t guaranteed to occur
even in England so the odds of it occurring in America are almost nonexistent.
But as a final word, is it really a bad thing to allow this to occur?
Reading our homework on monetary policies I asked myself that same question. Why doesn't the government merge both fiscal and monetary policies and departments? I found your post really interesting as to why we don't. Although you said this isn't a huge issue or seen as occurring in any countries, it makes me wonder how well the two departments would work together in creating a balanced economy.
ReplyDeleteI thought that this was a very relevant topic to what we have just learned this chapter. This was very thought provoking because you could use the advantages of both policies to benefit the entire economy. The only downside is then the quickness from the monetary policy that it would no longer be quicker because then they would have to go through congress too. This would involve more interaction between the fed and the government and allow them to work together to fix the problems of our economy.
ReplyDelete