Wednesday, December 18, 2019

The Failure of Amtrak

Alex Lee
Mrs. Straub
AP Economics
18 December 2019

The Failure of Amtrak
Trains are an essential element of America’s surface transportation system, both historically after the landmark building of the Transcontinental Railroad, and with the current day presence of an intense, well-funded, and robust freight rail system. However, one area where America has failed to keep up with the rest of the world in on-the-track-excellence is its passenger rail system Amtrak, and its failure to exceed or even meet the standard of passenger rail set in many other developed nations such as France and the United Kingdom.

On the surface, Amtrak looks like an effective transportation option, as it serves more than 500 destinations in 46 states, connecting the country together now just as it did in the 1800s. Passenger rail services are extremely important to a connected nation, as they support economic development, connect rural communities to the nation, and help reduce roadway congestion in major metropolitan regions. In addition, Amtrak facilities and services are vital to commuter rail agencies, allowing 840,000 commuters to reach their destinations every weekday.

However, in its current state, Amtrak is not the answer to a failing American passenger rail system. According to the Center of American Progress, in the fiscal year of 2012, Amtrak earned $2.877 billion in revenue and incurred $4.036 billion in expenses, incurring losses of over $1.1 billion, forcing substantial subsidies of around 30-35% to be given to our nation’s most popular rail service.
There are a variety of reasons why Amtrak fails to live up to the expectation of other country’s passenger rail services, such as France’s SNCF (state-owned) or the UK’s many profitable private-owned rail services. In my eyes, the easiest way to attack this is to put it in the government’s hands and increase funding for our NATIONAL rail system (as defined by Congress in 1971).

Since beginning operations in 1971, Amtrak has received, in inflation-adjusted terms, only $70 billion in total federal funding. Although that seems like a lot, from 2008-2014, Congress has backfilled the Highway Trust Fund with $65 billion in general fund revenues to avoid insolvency and promote improvements in infrastructure and safety. In just seven years, Congress provided nearly the same amount of general fund support for highways as Amtrak had received in its 45 years of existence. Moreover, when revenues rise as a result of robust ticket sales, such as recently when Amtrak unfolded their new “see this beautiful country” advertising campaign, Congress often uses this as a justification to cut federal support further, taking away momentum gained from an excited and captivated U.S. transportation audience and further burying Amtrak in the mud both economically and in reputation.

Inadequate funding also makes it difficult for Amtrak to comply with necessary safety requirements, such as the installation of positive train control, or PTC, technologies. Positive train control is a communication-based technology that relies on transmitting information using radio signals to provide real-time data on the location, speed, and direction of trains (DeGood). This system is capable of preventing derailments from excess speed, train collisions, and incursions into work zones, among other benefits. When Congress mandated the adoption of PTC in 2008, it did not provide any additional funding or set aside the radio spectrum for Amtrak and other transportation agencies to communicated. As a result, Amtrak and other providers have had to lease spectrum at market rates from spectrum holders, further driving up expenses and launching Amtrak into a tough economic hole, as well as forcing Amtrak to choose between basic rail maintenance and PTC installation.

Funding is not the only challenge, as the system of passenger rail in the United States is set up in a very flawed manner. Unlike passenger rail providers in many other countries, Amtrak operates most of its service on tracks owned by private freight railroads, states, and other public authorities, such as Union Pacific or the Kansas City Southern Railway. In fact, Amtrak owns only 28 percent of the 21,300 route miles it covers. This means that Amtrak has little to no control over its on-time performance, as scheduling and track maintenance decisions remain within private companies, who have no incentive to schedule their trains behind to allow Amtrak trains to pass by and arrive at stations on time. This is especially punishing to Amtrak, as their reputation relies a lot on their ability to get consumers to their locations on time and efficiently, which is not able to happen in the current setup of our national rail system.

So, what is there to do about this? Amtrak is a national asset that will not be able to continue to provide reliable service or expand to meet future population growth and travel demand without additional investment. This is especially true in the Northeast, where approximately one out of every three jobs in the region is within 5 miles of a passenger rail station. Over the next four decades, the region is expected to grow by more than 30 percent, adding approximately 15 million new residents. Without improved passenger and commuter rail service, this growth will lead to crippling congestion that hampers U.S. economic performance not only internationally, but domestically as well. In my eyes, the only logical way to solve this problem in the current, privately owned railroad industry that we live in, is to increase federal funding to include enhanced safety measures, create newer, more efficient infrastructure, and then, maybe one day, Amtrak will be able to become profitable.


Graphs show 1) the drop in Amtrak subsidy despite an increase in ridership 2) increase in ridership 3) loss vs. ridership





Works Cited
DeGood, Kevin. "Understanding Amtrak and the Importance of Passenger Rail in the United States." Center for American Progress. 2019 Center for American Progress, 4 June 2015. Web.

K, Harvey. "How to Fix Amtrak." Trains Magazine. Kalmbach Media, 1 Feb. 2009. Web.

Singer, M.E. "Fix Amtrak? Fix Its Board First." Railway Age. 2018 Simmons-Boardman Publishing Inc., 17 Jan. 2019. Web.

8 comments:

  1. It is evident in our country that the Amtrak system of transportation is uncommon and not as popular as other forms of transportation, however, I didn't know that it had losses amounting to $1.1 billion. I agree that reform is necessary in order to increase the popularity of the Amtrak system and potentially allow some profits to be made. Additionally, I think that just by introducing another popular system of transportation will be beneficial to our nation because other systems of transportation are beginning to become overpopulated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very well written post. It is crazy to here that they lost 1.1 billion dollars in one year. How are they still able to fund for all of the maintenance and additional costs that it takes to run a company like that? If they don't get government funding or start going into profit, soon the ticket rates will increase. It would be interesting to know how much the ticket prices have gone up in last few years that they have been running in the negative.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jared - I agree with your confusion and inquiries, I have no clue!! Merry Christmas. I also agree that if something isn't done about it soon, the consumer will ultimately be the one that takes on a majority of the cost, as raised ticket prices will lower demand, which could potentially then increase the loss due to a drop in revenue.

      Delete
  3. This is super interesting Alex. I think its also worth bringing up the fact that there aren't a lot of other preexisting companies like Amtrak, forcing them to do better and create faster routes. Obviously there isn't the demand like you said but I think the demand would change if Amtrak had competition and actually had to invest in getting better.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I really like the topic of choice as it is refreshing to see something so unique yet so meaningful. I like how thorough you were in this post as I come away knowing not only more about Amtrak itself, but also how the solution could look as well. While I am usually opposed to the government holding an entire sector, I believe that transportation is one the government needs to take over. Due to its unlikelihood of being profitable, the only way that it keep it running is through the government.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I never knew the importance of the Amtrak. This was very well written. I assume that since we live in Pewaukee, the use of any transportation besides cars and the public school bus, everything else is not as prevalent. So the importance of any other transportation is not relevant, thus being ignorant of the Amtrak dilemma. This article was very needed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Before reading this insightful piece I never knew how big of an impact Amtrak had on people's lives. It really is a shame that we are allowing this form of transportation to fall to the wayside and be neglected when it is quite beneficial to other similar nations. I agree with you that Amtrak should be funded by the government just like how the government pays for the highways. Even if we must incur extra tax for this utility I share the belief that it will improve the lives of Americans and strengthen our economy. Thank you for sharing this very thought provoking and interesting article, keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The above is a detailed explanation of the lost Ark Half-Demon Transformation Stream play for everyone, and interested partners can experience it. For more buy cheap Lost Ark gold campaigns, follow us.

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...